<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Testing Edit Flow with the Whitman Pioneer</title> <atom:link href="http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/</link> <description>Building a Better Technical Ecosystem for Student News Organizations</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>By: Megan Hassler-Mustang Daily</title><link>http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link> <dc:creator>Megan Hassler-Mustang Daily</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:25:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.copress.org/?p=2735#comment-2376</guid> <description>As the online editor of the Mustang Daily I use Edit Flow everyday. I think that edit flow has great potential to help newsrooms go Web first. Some suggestions/questions I have are:
-making posts capable of joint editing
-be able to enable e-mail notifications for specific users not just &quot;roles&quot;If multiple people could edit a post we could eliminate our use of google docs for concurrent editing.Just some thoughts, feel free to contact me @ maehassler@gmail.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the online editor of the Mustang Daily I use Edit Flow everyday. I think that edit flow has great potential to help newsrooms go Web first. Some suggestions/questions I have are:<br
/> -making posts capable of joint editing<br
/> -be able to enable e-mail notifications for specific users not just &#8220;roles&#8221;</p><p>If multiple people could edit a post we could eliminate our use of google docs for concurrent editing.</p><p>Just some thoughts, feel free to contact me @ <a
href="mailto:maehassler@gmail.com">maehassler@gmail.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A glimpse inside our new online workflow » The Pioneer Labs</title><link>http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/comment-page-1/#comment-2290</link> <dc:creator>A glimpse inside our new online workflow » The Pioneer Labs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.copress.org/?p=2735#comment-2290</guid> <description>[...] This post originally ran on the CoPress Blog under the title &#8220;Testing Edit Flow with the Whitman Pioneer&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post originally ran on the CoPress Blog under the title &#8220;Testing Edit Flow with the Whitman Pioneer&#8221; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew Spittle</title><link>http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link> <dc:creator>Andrew Spittle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:14:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.copress.org/?p=2735#comment-2288</guid> <description>Hey Andrew, thanks for the comment. It&#039;s definitely made life at the Pio so much easier.It interacts fairly well with the print workflow. Basically, after things have been marked as &quot;Ready for Web&quot; they&#039;re then copy and pasted into the InDesign template, which is great because it doesn&#039;t actually add any steps to the print workflow (we were copying out of Word documents).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew, thanks for the comment. It&#8217;s definitely made life at the Pio so much easier.</p><p>It interacts fairly well with the print workflow. Basically, after things have been marked as &#8220;Ready for Web&#8221; they&#8217;re then copy and pasted into the InDesign template, which is great because it doesn&#8217;t actually add any steps to the print workflow (we were copying out of Word documents).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew Jesaitis</title><link>http://www.copress.org/2009/10/09/testing-edit-flow-with-the-whitman-pioneer/comment-page-1/#comment-2287</link> <dc:creator>Andrew Jesaitis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:22:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.copress.org/?p=2735#comment-2287</guid> <description>Wow--amazing. I wish we had this when I was at the Pio. How does it interact with the print workfolow? Great Job!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8211;amazing. I wish we had this when I was at the Pio. How does it interact with the print workfolow? Great Job!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/27 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: www.copress.org @ 2012-02-09 04:16:36 -->
